In response to Tryfon's question last month (sorry I haven't looked at this board in a while), I took another look at the cited page
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lab/7378/postal.htmThere seems to have been a recent attempt to update it and remove/ correct some of the mistakes of old.
Nevertheless i would warn all readers that the byline on that page is not a guarantee of quality, rather the reverse in my opinion.
Some of the items are genuine facts, others are just trivia and speculations which remain to be verified. For example, the Voltaire story; Egbert Meissenburg has been trying for years to see if that old rumour can be substantiated.
It is true that sometime in the 17th century Venetian merchants were playing correspondence chess against Croatian merchants. This was testified by Hyde but he did not give a precise date or date-span so the 165 given on the page is just a guess.
Mistakes remaining (of course they may be fixed after somebody reads this) include:
It is not true that "In 1824, the London Chess Club challenged the Edinburgh Chess Club". On the contrary, it is well documented that Edinburgh challenged London.
When my history of British CC is finished, a lot of misconceptions about this match will be cleared up.
There is a clear contradiction on the page between the statement that "The earliest surviving correspondence game in America is a game from the Washington DD Chess Club vs, the New York Chess Club, in 1839." and the one a few lines lower:
"The first correspondence games in the United States was between Norfolk, Virginia and New York in 1842." (Neither of these statements is accurate and the latter is not even a grammatical sentence!)
"In the 1850s some chess magazines promoted correspondence chess tournaments."
This sentence is almost verbatim plagiarism of a sentence in the CC article in the Oxford Companion to Chess (2nd ed p95) except that one of the words added in this version makes the statement untrue. I am pretty sure the person who compiled the web page has no idea which magazines promoted CC tournaments. Wait for my book!
There are numerous other errors, inaccuracies and verbal infelicities and I am not going to waste any more time debunking them.
Some of the statements on the page are correct; mostly ones borrowed from Ken Whyld or the ICCF website.
If you have the page bookmarked, I suggest you remove it from your favourites.
Tim